Skip to main content

What Learning About Psychopaths Taught Me

Do you ever get those experiences where you are taken aback by your own actions or thoughts? Sometimes, when I feel vengeful, angry, or simply apathetic, I would think, "am I just crazy?". I ask myself this every time I catch myself not caring about the next horrible thing that has happened on the news or when I feel disconnected from a serious situation. After having read a good portion of American Psycho, I can now firmly conclude that I am not "just crazy", I am simply normal. I love how, through this book, so many questions I ask about myself with respect to my own levels of empathy and apathy can be answered. Because the novel is written from the perspective of a psychopath, it is easy to distinguish exactly how they think.

Christian Bale as Patrick Bateman in the "American Psycho" movie.

According to Business Insider, it is difficult to diagnose a psychopath, which I find interesting. The article says that psychopaths are more logical and care more about the greater good (in ethical dilemmas, for example). Even though these people make up only 1% of the population, people with more power such as CEO's are more likely to be psychopaths because they can make logical decisions more easily, without any emotional attachment. This is similar to Patrick Bateman, who has a job with a powerful position and who works on Wall Street. In addition, similar to how the article suggests that psychopaths care more for the greater good, Bateman sacrifices the expression of his authentic thoughts when he does or says things in social situations to appease others and to maintain civility. For example, I found it interesting when Bateman thinks, "Luis Carruthers [...] takes a seat next to mine which means that I'm supposed to take off my Walkman." (Ellis, page 107). This is only one of the many examples where Bateman points out what he should be doing in a social situation instead of what he genuinely does. This quality about him is what fascinated me the most about him, or psychopaths in general, assuming that he represents how psychopaths generally think. Bateman frequently observes, analyses, and acts during social situations based on what he knows he should be doing to fit into it, and he does it expertly.

I think that this is what really made me conclude that there is nothing wrong with the way I think sometimes. I am not able to adapt perfectly to social situations because I live, act, and speak genuinely. Thus, I really appreciate this aspect of the novel for teaching me this.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Patty Winters Show: a reflection of Bateman's mental state

One of Patrick Bateman's most consistent references, other than his favourite brand names, is his documentation of the topic on The Patty Winters Show . While the topics seems unrelated to Bateman, it is unusual for him to be so invested in this show, considering that the topics in the beginning of the novel seem unlike for him to be engaged about. As the novel progresses, it is clear that the show represents Bateman's mental degradation. In the beginning of the novel, the topics were innocent and normal: autism, the President, etc. Then, the topics become more unusual: toddler murderers, a cheerio that sat in a small chair and was interviewed for an hour, a boy who fell in love with a bar of soap, a man who lit his daughter on fire while she was giving birth, etc. In the last third of the novel, especially, The Patty Winters Show becomes a more direct reflection of Bateman's decreased sense of reality. Near the end of the book, Bateman's perfect persona that he obse...

A Glimpse Into Bateman's Lunacy (2/3)

After reading the first third of the novel, I had a brief sense of regret for choosing to read this book for this project. I thought that the novel was not demonstrating Patrick Bateman to be an interesting or complex enough character for me to truly be engaged in it. However, I was pleasantly surprised by just how much the second third of the novel proved why American Psycho is such an iconic book. There are so many things that I can talk about in this section of the novel, but the overlying constant is the fact that Bateman is losing his mind. There are so many differences between the first and second third of the novel with respect to Bateman's narration, thoughts, and actions that demonstrate his increased delirium. Just to give a clear contrast, here is a scene from the movie that shows how put-together Bateman was previously: From the second third of the novel, there are so many fantastic examples that I could talk about where Bateman loses his composure, status, and res...

An Epiphany: Bateman's Psychopathy Comes Down to his Sense of Reality

If I had time, I would have written a more in-depth analysis of Bateman's interpretation of reality. But since I am so busy right now, this will be a short post about the epiphany I had that will conclude my psycho-analysis of Patrick Bateman. Patrick Bateman is a psychopath because his only source of experiencing anything real is through extreme means. All this to say, Bateman is a victim of his perception of reality, which could be the result of a mental illness like schizophrenia, with which reality is difficult to comprehend. In any case, Bateman is seeking for some escape from the pain in his life, whether that is feeling loved, finding his identity, or some other void that he needs to fill. The reason why Bateman is able to carry out these inhumane acts is because he does not consider the consequences to be real. For example, while in the middle of torturing a woman, he thinks, "This is my reality. Everything outside this is like some movie I once saw" (Easton ...