What Learning About Psychopaths Taught Me

Do you ever get those experiences where you are taken aback by your own actions or thoughts? Sometimes, when I feel vengeful, angry, or simply apathetic, I would think, "am I just crazy?". I ask myself this every time I catch myself not caring about the next horrible thing that has happened on the news or when I feel disconnected from a serious situation. After having read a good portion of American Psycho, I can now firmly conclude that I am not "just crazy", I am simply normal. I love how, through this book, so many questions I ask about myself with respect to my own levels of empathy and apathy can be answered. Because the novel is written from the perspective of a psychopath, it is easy to distinguish exactly how they think.

Christian Bale as Patrick Bateman in the "American Psycho" movie.

According to Business Insider, it is difficult to diagnose a psychopath, which I find interesting. The article says that psychopaths are more logical and care more about the greater good (in ethical dilemmas, for example). Even though these people make up only 1% of the population, people with more power such as CEO's are more likely to be psychopaths because they can make logical decisions more easily, without any emotional attachment. This is similar to Patrick Bateman, who has a job with a powerful position and who works on Wall Street. In addition, similar to how the article suggests that psychopaths care more for the greater good, Bateman sacrifices the expression of his authentic thoughts when he does or says things in social situations to appease others and to maintain civility. For example, I found it interesting when Bateman thinks, "Luis Carruthers [...] takes a seat next to mine which means that I'm supposed to take off my Walkman." (Ellis, page 107). This is only one of the many examples where Bateman points out what he should be doing in a social situation instead of what he genuinely does. This quality about him is what fascinated me the most about him, or psychopaths in general, assuming that he represents how psychopaths generally think. Bateman frequently observes, analyses, and acts during social situations based on what he knows he should be doing to fit into it, and he does it expertly.

I think that this is what really made me conclude that there is nothing wrong with the way I think sometimes. I am not able to adapt perfectly to social situations because I live, act, and speak genuinely. Thus, I really appreciate this aspect of the novel for teaching me this.

Comments

The Patty Winters Show: a reflection of Bateman's mental state

One of Patrick Bateman's most consistent references, other than his favourite brand names, is his documentation of the topic on The Patty Winters Show . While the topics seems unrelated to Bateman, it is unusual for him to be so invested in this show, considering that the topics in the beginning of the novel seem unlike for him to be engaged about. As the novel progresses, it is clear that the show represents Bateman's mental degradation. In the beginning of the novel, the topics were innocent and normal: autism, the President, etc. Then, the topics become more unusual: toddler murderers, a cheerio that sat in a small chair and was interviewed for an hour, a boy who fell in love with a bar of soap, a man who lit his daughter on fire while she was giving birth, etc. In the last third of the novel, especially, The Patty Winters Show becomes a more direct reflection of Bateman's decreased sense of reality. Near the end of the book, Bateman's perfect persona that he obse

A Glimpse Into Bateman's Lunacy (2/3)

After reading the first third of the novel, I had a brief sense of regret for choosing to read this book for this project. I thought that the novel was not demonstrating Patrick Bateman to be an interesting or complex enough character for me to truly be engaged in it. However, I was pleasantly surprised by just how much the second third of the novel proved why American Psycho is such an iconic book. There are so many things that I can talk about in this section of the novel, but the overlying constant is the fact that Bateman is losing his mind. There are so many differences between the first and second third of the novel with respect to Bateman's narration, thoughts, and actions that demonstrate his increased delirium. Just to give a clear contrast, here is a scene from the movie that shows how put-together Bateman was previously: From the second third of the novel, there are so many fantastic examples that I could talk about where Bateman loses his composure, status, and res

How Much Can We Trust Our Narrator?

Patrick Bateman: handsome, wealthy, sophisticated Wall Street banker by day, ruthless and psychotic killer by night; the only true reality that we know about his story is that he is our narrator. Whether or not he is truly a killer, we can never know. There are so many clues in the second third of the novel that Bateman's recount of his experience does not make logical sense. There seems to be an ongoing mystery when deciphering the difference between what really happens to Bateman and what he tells us. How many times does he have to outwardly tell people about his crimes before they acknowledge it? How many times does he have to kill in public before someone, anyone on the busy streets of downtown New York, notices and calls the police? How many times does he have to leave bloody clues all over his apartment, his clothes, and his sheets, before someone realizes that there is something inhumanely dangerous about this man? As a reader, I am suspicious and intrigued. As an author, s

American Psycho(-analysis)

Search This Blog